Risk of Ruin Simulator
From your win rate, payoff ratio (risk–reward) and the share of capital you risk per trade, this tool calculates the theoretical probability that your account falls to your ruin line. Enter the results of an EA or a discretionary strategy to check whether your current lot size is too large.
Your inputs
Fixed amount: assumes you risk the same cash amount, based on your starting capital, on every trade.
Risk of ruin heat map
Win rate × payoff / risk per trade and ruin line held at your current inputs| Win rate \ Payoff | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.25 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 2.5 | 3.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 85% | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 80% | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 75% | 100 | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 70% | 100 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 65% | 100 | 100 | 3.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 60% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 55% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 50% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 45% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 60.7 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 40% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0 |
| 35% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 28.9 | 1.3 | 0.2 |
| 30% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 37.1 | 4.0 |
| 25% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 20% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 15% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 10% | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
How to read: paler means closer to 0%, deeper red closer to 100%. The sharp line where pale meets deep red is the cliff in your money management.
Risk per trade vs risk of ruin
Win rate, payoff and ruin line held at your current inputsHow to read: the point just before the curve turns sharply upward is the highest risk % you can take with room to spare.
How to Read & Use This Tool
From what risk of ruin means, through reading the numbers, to putting it to work in your day-to-day money management.
14 Key Terms to Know First
Four terms worth understanding before you use this tool.
1. Win rate
The share of all trades that closed in profit. 45 wins out of 100 trades is a 45% win rate. It is often assumed that higher is better, but on its own it says nothing about how good a strategy is — it only becomes meaningful alongside the payoff ratio.
2. Payoff ratio (risk–reward)
Average win ÷ average loss. How many times larger a typical win is than a typical loss. A "cut losses short, let winners run" approach exceeds 1.0. Even with a low win rate, a high payoff ratio can leave you comfortably profitable overall.
3. Risk per trade
The share of capital (%) you lose when a trade hits your stop. It is set by your lot size and stop distance. Unlike win rate and payoff ratio, this is the one variable you can change today by your own decision, and it has the greatest influence on your risk of ruin.
4. Risk of ruin
The theoretical probability that, trading on under the same conditions, your capital falls to your ruin line. The approach set out by Nauzer J. Balsara is widely known, and the result follows from the three numbers above plus your ruin line.
Risk of ruin is a cliff, not a gentle slope
As you raise the risk per trade, the risk of ruin does not creep up gradually — it jumps once you cross a certain boundary. Knowing this shape is the single most important point in money management.
Conceptual illustration. Where the boundary sits depends on your win rate, payoff ratio and ruin line. Even if you are safe today, a few percentage points off your win rate can put you on the far side of the cliff.
2What Can This Tool Do?
See instantly whether your lot is too big
Enter three numbers and you get the theoretical risk of ruin plus a four-level verdict. Whether your lot size is excessive takes seconds to answer.
See which side of the cliff you are on
Every win rate × payoff combination shown as colour. You can see at a glance how far your strategy sits from the boundary.
Back out the right risk %
The curve shows how ruin probability responds to risk. Find where it turns sharply upward, then work back to your appropriate lot size.
3Reading the Verdict — Four Signals
Your result carries a verdict based on the level of ruin probability. On the heat map, paler means closer to 0% and deeper red closer to 100%.
| Verdict | Risk of ruin | What it means and what to do |
|---|---|---|
| ✔ Safe | Under 1% | The level generally taken as sustainable over the long run. Keep your current money management. |
| △ Caution | 1–10% | A level at which a run of losses could realistically wipe you out. Consider reducing your risk %. |
| ▲ Danger zone | 10–50% | On the numbers, this means "capital runs out once every few attempts". Review your money management as a whole — lot size first, but stop-loss rules too. |
| ✖ Critical | 50% or more | Continue like this and you will most likely lose your capital. Lowering the risk % alone often will not fix it, so also look at improving win rate and payoff ratio — the strategy itself. |
4Four Patterns Worth Recognising
Comparing your inputs against the heat map tells you where the problem in your money management actually lies.
Positive expectancy, yet the verdict says danger
How to spot it: expectancy (R) is positive, but the verdict is danger zone or worse.
What it means: the classic case of a sound strategy undone by too much risk per trade — the lot is simply too large.
Fix: cut risk to 1–2% (that alone transforms the result)Safe, but right on the edge
How to spot it: your own cell reads 0%, but the neighbouring cell (win rate −5%) reads 100%.
What it means: a setting with no margin — a small wobble in performance drops you into the danger zone.
Fix: lower risk % until the neighbouring cells are safe tooLow win rate, still safe
How to spot it: a win rate in the 30s, a payoff ratio of 2.5 or more, and a safe verdict.
What it means: the classic trend-following profile. The low win rate is not itself a problem.
Fix: don't judge a strategy on win rate alone — keep this combinationStuck at 100% whatever you do
How to spot it: ruin probability stays at 100% however far you cut the risk %.
What it means: expectancy is zero or negative (e.g. 50% win rate × 1.0 payoff). Money management cannot rescue this.
Fix: improve the strategy itself, not the lot size55-Step Usage Workflow
Treat this not as a prediction of the future but as a regular check-up on whether your lot size is still appropriate. Make it a monthly routine.
6Do's and Don'ts
7Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Why do I need to calculate a risk of ruin at all?
Because even an excellent strategy with positive expectancy will take you out of the game if the risk per trade is so large that a run of losses exhausts your capital. Winning over the long run takes two things — positive expectancy and not going broke — and this tool checks the second.
Should I use "fixed amount" or "fixed fraction"?
Choose fixed amount if you trade the same lot size every time, and fixed fraction if you compound — adjusting the lot as your capital rises and falls. Under fixed fraction the cash at risk shrinks automatically as capital falls, which in theory makes ruin less likely, but set the risk % too high and compounding turns against you, sending the risk of ruin sharply higher (see the next item).
Why does a fixed fraction hit 100% when I raise the risk %?
Because under compounding, losses weigh more heavily than gains. Lose 50% and you need a 100% gain to get back. That asymmetry means that if the risk per trade is too large, capital declines over the long run even though each individual trade has positive expectancy. Past that threshold, ruin becomes all but certain in theory, and this tool shows 100%. It is known as overbetting, and it is the main thing to watch when sizing as a fixed fraction.
What should I set the ruin line to?
The right answer is the level at which you have already decided you would stop trading. If you have not decided, start by trying 20–50%. 0% (total loss) is the most lenient theoretical setting; in reality people stop well before that.
Can I get the payoff ratio from the profit factor (PF)?
Yes. PF = gross profit ÷ gross loss, so payoff ratio = PF × (1 − win rate) ÷ win rate. For example, PF 1.5 with a 60% win rate gives 1.5 × 0.4 ÷ 0.6 = 1.0. EA forward-test figures can be used directly.
Why is the heat map almost all 0% and 100%, with little in between?
Because that is what risk of ruin genuinely looks like. It changes abruptly across a boundary — a cliff — and intermediate values only appear very close to that boundary. Which is precisely why the thing to check is whether you sit comfortably clear of it.
My win rate and payoff change with every trade. Which figures should I use?
Use your last 50–100 trades and refresh monthly. Using it repeatedly as a check-up, rather than as a fixed number, is what lets you catch early on whether a change in performance has left your lot size too large.
8Glossary
- Expectancy
- The average profit or loss you can expect per trade. In R: "win rate × payoff ratio − (1 − win rate)". Unless it is positive, no money management wins over the long run.
- R
- A unit in which the amount risked on one trade equals 1. "+2R" means a profit twice the size of your stop distance.
- Profit factor (PF)
- Gross profit ÷ gross loss. Above 1.0 means the strategy makes money.
- Position sizing
- Setting the lot size for a trade from your capital and the risk you will accept. The single most important skill governing your risk of ruin.
- Drawdown
- The largest fall from a peak in capital. Alongside risk of ruin, one of the standard money-management measures.
- Probability of consecutive losses
- With win rate p, the chance of n losses in a row is (1−p)ⁿ. Even at a 50% win rate, 10 in a row happens about once every 1,000 sequences. Losing streaks are not anomalies; they are certainties.
- Compounding / fixed sizing
- Adjusting the lot as capital changes / always trading the same lot. These correspond to "fixed fraction" and "fixed amount" here.
- Overbetting
- Raising the risk per trade so far that compounding turns negative and capital declines over the long run, even with a positive-expectancy strategy.
Method: We assume a random walk of "+k units with probability p, −1 unit with probability 1−p", solve p·x^(k+1) − x + (1 − p) = 0 for its root θ in (0,1), and compute the risk of ruin as θⁿ, where n is the number of losing units the account can absorb before reaching the ruin line. In fixed-amount mode, n = (1 − ruin line) ÷ risk per trade. In fixed-fraction mode, capital is evaluated in log space, with a win counted as log(1 + k × risk) and a loss as −log(1 − risk), giving an effective payoff ratio and unit count.
Assumptions and limits: This tool shows theoretical figures on the assumption that the win rate and payoff ratio stay constant throughout. It does not account for slippage, spread widening, sudden shifts in market conditions, or variable-lot methods such as averaging down and martingale. Your real risk of ruin can be higher than shown.
The Titan FX Research Hub purpose is to provide solely informational and educational content to its users, and not investment, legal, financial, tax or any type of personalised advice. This tool does not recommend or solicit the purchase or sale of any financial product, nor does it guarantee or predict future losses or investment results. All trading decisions remain your own responsibility.