ROE (Return on Equity)
Overview of ROE (Return on Equity)
ROE, or Return on Equity, is a key financial metric that measures a company's ability to generate profits from shareholders' equity. It serves as a benchmark for assessing how efficiently a company is utilizing shareholders' capital to generate income.
A high ROE indicates that a company is effectively leveraging its equity to create profits, reflecting strong management and capital efficiency. Conversely, a low ROE may suggest inefficiencies in the company’s operations or business model.
This article explains the definition of ROE, its calculation method, and its role in investment strategies.
How to Calculate ROE
ROE (%) = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders' Equity × 100
- Net Profit: The profit generated by a company in a fiscal year for all shareholders.
- Shareholders' Equity: The shareholders' investment, representing the company’s net assets (excluding liabilities such as bank loans).
For example: If a company has raised $100 million in equity and achieves a net profit of $50 million in a fiscal year:
ROE = $50 million ÷ $100 million × 100% = 50%
This calculation indicates the company achieved a 50% return on its shareholders' equity.
The following is a schematic diagram of ROE.

What Can ROE Tell Us?
ROE reflects how much profit a company generates relative to its shareholders' equity. Generally:
- A higher ROE suggests that the company efficiently uses equity to generate profits.
- A lower ROE may signal poor operational efficiency or ineffective capital utilization.
Typically, an ROE between 8% and 10% is considered acceptable. Companies with ROE exceeding 10% are often viewed as high-quality investments. However, average ROE can vary across industries, so it’s essential to consider sector-specific benchmarks.
ROE: A Comparison Between the U.S. and Japan
A comparison of companies from the S&P 500 Index (U.S.) and the TOPIX 500 Index (Japan) reveals significant differences:

- In the TOPIX 500, 40% of companies have an ROE below the 8% standard.
- In the S&P 500, only 14% of companies fall below this threshold.
This comparison suggests that U.S. companies tend to demonstrate higher operational efficiency compared to their Japanese counterparts.
Limitations of ROE
While ROE is useful for evaluating investments, it has limitations because it excludes a company’s liabilities.
For example, consider two companies with the same total assets and net profit but different equity structures:

Company A: Total Assets = $10 billion (Liabilities = $8 billion, Equity = $2 billion) Net Profit = $500 million ROE = $500 million ÷ $2 billion × 100% = 25%
Company B: Total Assets = $10 billion (Liabilities = $2 billion, Equity = $8 billion) Net Profit = $500 million ROE = $500 million ÷ $8 billion × 100% = 6.25%
Company A has a much higher ROE, but this is because it uses more debt (liabilities). Simply looking at ROE might make a company with higher leverage appear more efficient, even though it carries greater financial risk.
Difference Between ROE and ROA
Another related metric is ROA (Return on Assets), which measures the efficiency of a company’s total assets in generating profits.
ROA Calculation
ROA (%) = Net Profit ÷ Total Assets × 100
- ROE uses shareholders' equity as the denominator.
- ROA uses total assets (equity + liabilities) as the denominator.
ROA takes into account all company assets, including debt, making it a more comprehensive measure of operational efficiency.

Conclusion
ROE is a valuable metric for understanding how efficiently a company utilizes shareholders' equity to generate profits. However, it’s important to consider its limitations and analyze it alongside other indicators, such as ROA, to get a complete picture of a company’s financial health.
Investors should also be aware of sector-specific ROE benchmarks and the impact of leverage on financial metrics to make informed investment decisions.